Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mark Whitehouse vs Joshua Goodger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Whitehouse vs Goodger analysis and find out who is favored!
Mark Whitehouse vs Joshua Goodger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Whitehouse 1 - 0 Goodger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Whitehouse has won 44.97% of points on their second serve, while Goodger has won 46.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Whitehouse, in recent form, has won 49.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Goodger has won 43.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.45% and 31.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Whitehouse has saved 58.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Goodger has saved 58.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Whitehouse has won 41.67% of matches played (W/L 15/ 21), with Goodger winning 29.17% (W/L 7/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Whitehouse has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 40/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 13/ 16). Goodger has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Whitehouse has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.91% of matches (W/L 9/ 13), where as Goodger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 29.17% of matches (W/L 7/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Whitehouse winning 1 times and Goodger being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Whitehouse winning 2 and Goodger winning 1. The last match between Whitehouse and Goodger was at the M25 Roehampton, 19-07-2023, Second, Grass with Mark Whitehouse getting the victory 7-5 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Whitehouse and Goodger have played a deciding set 1 times, with Whitehouse winning 1 times and Goodger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Whitehouse winning 0, and Goodger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Whitehouse has played against opponents with an average rank of 299 while Goodger has played against players with an average rank of 186.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Whitehouse has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Goodger has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Whitehouse has converted 33.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Goodger has converted 45.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
894
Rank
523
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
821
Rank
821
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
50% (181-181)
Career Total W/L
47% (38-43)
42% (5-7)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Whitehouse VS Goodger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Mark Whitehouse | Joshua Goodger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:0 | 1:55:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (60/82) | 65% (74/113) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (47/60) | 68% (50/74) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (10/22) | 44% (17/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 15% (3/20) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (46/113) | 30% (25/82) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Whitehouse VS Goodger H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Joshua Goodger
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
74 of
113)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
74)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
15%
(
3 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
113)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mark Whitehouse | Joshua Goodger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (5/7) | 33% (2/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (12/15) | 36% (5/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (121/140) | 48% (77/83) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (4/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.76 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 96 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 37 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:16 | 1:43:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 137.25 | 187.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (526/830) | 65% (283/436) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (387/526) | 68% (192/283) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (135/304) | 46% (71/153) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (19/58) | 46% (11/24) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (275/793) | 35% (135/381) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 45% (5/6) | 33% (2/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (5/12) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 25% (4/1) |
Mark Whitehouse Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Mark Whitehouse
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Mark Whitehouse
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Mark Whitehouse
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
5
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Andrin Casanova
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
43%
(
39 of
91)
10
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Mark Whitehouse
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
74 of
112)
11
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
55 of
74)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Adam Panaras
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
26 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Hugo Pierre
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Mark Whitehouse
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
16
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Mark Whitehouse
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
11
Aces
21
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Ioannis Kountourakis
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
7
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
36 of
44)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
29 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Joshua Goodger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Joshua Goodger
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
Demetris Azoides
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Joshua Goodger
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Loxley
Player
Joshua Goodger
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
43 of
53)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 7-6(3) 11-9 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Joshua Goodger
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
David Quayle
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 7-6(2) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Demetris Azoides
Player
Joshua Goodger
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
Simon Anthony Ivanov
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petros Chrysochos
Player
Joshua Goodger
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Joshua Goodger
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
13
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
11 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(12) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Whitehouse Vs Goodger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
